Musings of the Great Eric

The interesting, the amazing, and some stuff only I would ever care about


« Toggle Left Sidebar Home Toggle Right Sidebar »

The death of privacy

For Some, Online Persona Undermines a Résumé

When a small consulting company in Chicago was looking to hire a summer intern this month, the company’s president went online to check on a promising candidate who had just graduated from the University of Illinois.

At Facebook, a popular social networking site, the executive found the candidate’s Web page with this description of his interests: “smokin’ blunts” (cigars hollowed out and stuffed with marijuana), shooting people and obsessive sex, all described in vivid slang.

It did not matter that the student was clearly posturing. He was done.

Personally, I take a negative view of employers who would judge a person based on this. Students have always engaged in college escapades; the only difference with this generation is that they’re being recorded (and anyone with half a brain knows that what’s put onto these sites is probably exagerrated). I wonder what view we’d have of certain powerful people today, if we could easily Google their MySpace profiles from th 60’s and 70’s? The vast majority of their older employees would have done the same sort of stuff in college, it was just unknown to the interviewer at the time. Does it really speak that much to how a person will function in a professional work environment? (The answer is no).

The current generation is putting more and more of their lives online through blogs, social networking sites, and profiles throughout the internet. To judge them by what they put there is to deny them any separation of personal and professional lives. No one at that age is really thinking too hard about the future, and I think it’s wrong to expect them to. The onus we’re putting on students is to ask them to censor everything they say or do from Junior High School onwards in preparation for a future job interview. Do we really want the kind of individuals who are anal enough to do that?

In fairness though, the author of the article did go and find employers with a common sense attitude, and there’s some question of how commonplace this is:

Some companies, including Enterprise Rent-a-Car, Ernst & Young and Osram Sylvania, said they did not use the Internet to check on college job applicants.

“I’d rather not see that part of them,” said Maureen Crawford Hentz, manager of talent acquisition at Osram Sylvania. “I don’t think it’s related to their bona fide occupational qualifications.”

Some college career executives are skeptical that many employers routinely check applicants online. “My observation is that it’s more fiction than fact,” said Tom Devlin, director of the career center at the University of California, Berkeley.

My guess is that any employer who routinely judges applicants by their online persona will eventually suffer for it, as they pass up talented, qualified individuals due to unrelated factors. My other guess is that the vast majority aren’t technologically savvy enough to do it in the first place.

Aside from that though, what’s interesting here is that we don’t just have a generation gap, it’s a generation chasm. Some quotes from the article:

“A lot of it makes me think, what kind of judgment does this person have?” said the company’s president, Brad Karsh. “Why are you allowing this to be viewed publicly, effectively, or semipublicly?”

“I was just shocked by the amount of stuff that she was willing to publicly display,” Ms. Homayoun said. “When I saw that, I thought, ‘O.K., so much for that.’”

“I never really considered that employers would do something like that,” he said. “I thought they would just look at your résumé and grades.”

In other words, the adult world just doesn’t get it. And kids today, they just don’t get the adult world. Eventually the kids today will become the recruiters of tomorrow and bring their attitudes about online expression with them. For now though, it just serves as more evidence of the massive cultural shift happening all around us.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Posted in Technology at June 11th, 2006 at 10:39 am by Eric | 1 Comment

The age old question is finally answered

Who would win in a fight, the Enterprise or a Star Destroyer?

Well it’s an age old question if you’re a geek anyway. The editing could be a little smoother, but you have to appreciate the effort.

(First shot at embedding a YouTube video here, hope it works)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Irreverant, Pop Culture at June 10th, 2006 at 8:37 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Why women have breasts

Finally, science asks something important:

Many people may suppose that the question of the title is a stupid one, given that the answer is so obvious: women have breasts for feeding babies. In fact, the question is a good one, because it is a mystery why the vast majority of women has breasts. Most women are, at this moment, not lactating, and yet they have breasts. If breasts were merely for feeding babies, then most women would not have them. They would develop them only during pregnancy, and would lose them again when they stopped breast-feeding. Humans are unique in the animal world, in that they develop breasts at puberty and retain them into old age, whether or not they ever get pregnant. This requires an explanation.

It’s a long article offering many possible reasons and is difficult to sum up. Let me just say that whatever the reason… yay for boobies!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Science at June 10th, 2006 at 8:12 pm by Eric | 1 Comment

Record Meteorite hits Norway

As Wednesday morning dawned, northern Norway was hit with an impact comparable to the atomic bomb used on Hiroshima.

This just serves a reminder that somewhere out there, one of those things is on target to end civilization as we know it. What are we doing to prepare? Nothing.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Science at June 10th, 2006 at 9:28 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Awesome exchange between Dan Glickman and John Perry Barlow

Hollywood and the hackers.

Dan Glickman is the current head of the MPAA. John Perry Barlow is the head of the EFF, and a former lyricist for the Grateful dead. Here’s some highlights:

Dan Glickman: John Perry Barlow is the one who’s doing a disservice to the consumers, because you see if you don’t adequately compensate the artist, the director, the creator, the actor, they won’t do it in the first place so people won’t get movies.

DK: It is ridiculous to believe that you can give product away for free and be more successful. I mean it defies the laws of nature.

Would a clothing store give all their clothes for free? Would a car dealership give all its cars for free? Of course not. If they don’t make a profit in this world they’re out of business. That’s just the laws of human nature.

The fact of the matter is that people who create content for movies and television have to make a profit. If they don’t you won’t see all this wonderful stuff and listen to it.

Well, I gotta admit, he has a point. No one would create content unless they can be well compensated for it. Well, except that they do. Most artists I know are stoked just to have someone look at, read, or listen to whatever they create. People have always created content for the love of doing so; people will continue to create content for the love of doing so.

Oh yeah, and no one in this world makes money by giving stuff away for free, except for:

So this guy is either an idiot or a liar. Or maybe both.

JPB: I’ve got good news and bad news and good news. And the good news is that you guys have managed to buy every major legislative body on the planet, and the courts are even with you. So you’ve done a great job there and you should congratulate yourself.

But you know the problem is - the bad news is that you’re up against a dedicated foe that is younger and smarter that you are and will be alive when you’re dead. You’re 55 years old and these kids are 17 and they’re just smarter than you. So you’re gonna lose that one.

But the good news is that you guys are mean sons of bitches and you’ve been figuring out ways of ripping off audiences and artists for centuries…..

That about sums it up.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Copyright DRM and Media at June 9th, 2006 at 6:53 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Senate fails to repeal Paris Hilton tax

Senate Plan to Repeal Inheritance Tax Fails

The Senate rejected a plan yesterday to permanently repeal the federal tax on inherited estates, but lawmakers continued to negotiate behind the scenes to try to find a compromise that would reduce the levy significantly.

Voting 57 to 41, the Senate fell three votes short of the 60 needed to cut off debate and move to consider a Republican proposal that would have eliminated the estate tax. The levy is currently phasing out and will vanish in 2010, only to spring back to life in 2011.

Wow. The Senate didn’t bend over backwards to help out the poor oppressed billionaires? I’m speechless.

Technorati Tags:

Posted in Politics at June 9th, 2006 at 7:13 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Say it isn’t so George

Ain’t It Cool News:

The short of it is that Lucas hates the way the original trilogy appeared back in the day, and appears to hate the fact that most fans prefer it that way. So, when he did those new SFX versions in the late nineties, he “taped over” the original negative. So how are they going to do a DVD transfer? Well, they’re copying it directly off the Laserdisc copy they made way back when.

From the laserdiscs? From the laserdiscs? From the LASERDISCS?

George Lucas, I hate you. You toy with my emotions. I know now how how battered wife syndrome feels. I keep coming back, hoping you’ll change… but I always wind up with new bruises.

Goddammit.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Pop Culture at June 8th, 2006 at 9:28 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Jesus wants you to beat your kids

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these people?

The Pearls are evangelical Christians who believe corporal punishment is “doing it God’s way”. With a mailing list of tens of thousands of parents, the Pearls say that the justification for their approach is in scripture: “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes” (Proverbs 13:24).

Chastening begins early. “For the under-one-year-old, a little, 10- to 12-inch long, willowy branch (stripped of any knots that might break the skin) about one-eighth inch diameter is sufficient,” writes Michael Pearl. With older children he advises: “After a short explanation about bad attitudes and the need to love, patiently and calmly apply the rod to his backside. Somehow, after eight or 10 licks, the poison is transformed into gushing love and contentment. The world becomes a beautiful place. A brand-new child emerges. It makes an adult stare at the rod in wonder, trying to see what magic is contained therein.”

These people have no morals, no sense of ethics, no sense of right and wrong. The people (and yes, I am including all evangelicals here) lack even the most basic sense of human decency, compassion, or empathy - they’re sociopaths, in the strictest definition of the word.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Atheism at June 8th, 2006 at 10:33 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Judge orders lawers to settle dispute via Rock, Paper, Scissors

CNN:

Faced with the inability of two bickering attorneys to resolve even the most innocuous scheduling questions without his intervention, a Florida federal judge yesterday ordered the two to meet on the steps of the federal courthouse and resolve their latest quarrel by playing “one (1) game of ‘rock, paper, scissors.’ “

This Judge is now a hero of mine.

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in Irreverant at June 8th, 2006 at 10:16 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Zarqawi dead

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi killed in air raid:

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the most-wanted terrorist in Iraq who waged a bloody campaign of beheadings and suicide bombings, was killed when U.S. warplanes dropped 500-pound bombs on his isolated safehouse, officials said Thursday. His death was a long-sought victory in the war in Iraq.

Good riddance.

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in Politics at June 8th, 2006 at 9:19 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Beer loses to iPod

Beer losing college market share to… iPods?

Well, the unthinkable has happened. According to a recent survey by the Student Monitor that has been conducted twice a year for the last 18 years (that makes that 36 times, for us college grads in the house), Apple’s ever-popular iPod has somehow managed to surpass beer in popularity on college campuses this year, which is only the second time in history that “beer” has managed to be overtaken by, well, something that’s not beer. The last time? Nearly ten years ago in 1997, with “The Internet.” God, we’re all nerds.

Hmm… I’ve never tried to get drunk off an iPod before. This is an idea worthy of experimentation.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Irreverant at June 8th, 2006 at 7:29 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Hillary Rosen rethinks previous idiocy

The former head of the RIAA considers the possibility that maybe suing your customers and crippling the products you sell them isn’t the best business strategy.

I don’t honestly know what I would have done about the individual lawsuits had I stayed. I certainly participated in multiple planning and debate sessions about them. There were good arguments on both sides and the staff at the RIAA are thoughtful, good people who work hard to protect their constituency. Thankfully my plan to leave was firmly in place and I didn’t have to make that tough call or take the heat for the one that was made.

But for the record, I do share a concern that the lawsuits have outlived most of their usefulness and that the record companies need to work harder to implemnt a strategy that legitimizes more p2p sites and expands the download and subscription pool by working harder with the tech community to get devices and music services to work better together. That is how their business will expand most quickly. The iPod is still too small a part of the overall potential of the market and its propietary DRM just bugs me. Speaking of DRM, it is time to rethink that strategy as well……… At some point, I will write more comprehensively about those years and these issues….then again, maybe not.

It’s amazing how many people see the light of common sense and reason once they don’t have any power to do anything about it, isn’t it? Of course, I’m also sure that this new position of hers has absolutely nothing to do with the interests of her new consulting firm.

As a side note, the article sounds like it was written by a third grader. You’d think a former high powered executive would know how to proofread and write intelligently.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Copyright DRM and Media at June 7th, 2006 at 10:10 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Google might pull out of China?

Brin says Google compromised principles:

Meeting with reporters near Capitol Hill, Brin said Google had agreed to the censorship demands only after Chinese authorities blocked its service in that country. Google’s rivals accommodated the same demands — which Brin described as “a set of rules that we weren’t comfortable with” — without international criticism, he said.

“We felt that perhaps we could compromise our principles but provide ultimately more information for the Chinese and be a more effective service and perhaps make more of a difference,” Brin said.

Brin said Google is trying to improve its censored search service, Google.cn, before deciding whether to reverse course. He said virtually all the company’s customers in China use the non-censored service.

What I’d love to see is all the US tech companies pull out of China. China needs Google a lot more than the other way around; it’d be nice if they actually pushed China to take some steps towards a more open and free society. Maybe I’m being overly optomistic to even hope for such a thing.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Technology at June 7th, 2006 at 8:11 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Einstein’s brain WAS different

A peek into the mind of a genius

It was, without doubt, one of the finest minds of all time. Now scientists have proved that Albert Einstein’s brain was not only unique in its ability to process concepts: it was also physically different.

New research comparing the characteristics of Einstein’s brain with that of four men of similar age has found remarkable structural differences.

Parts of his brain were found to be larger than those of the others, and he also appeared to have had more brain cells, scientists have found previously.

Einstein has long topped my list of historical figures I’d most like to have met. I find this bit of research fascinating.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Science at June 6th, 2006 at 3:02 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Special forces invent stealth wings

So cool.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Technology, Science at June 6th, 2006 at 1:03 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Storm of the century to occur on July 4th

Jovian Storms Prepare To Duke It Out

Astronomers on Earth will have ringside seats to a face-off between two of the biggest storms in the solar system.

In one corner will be Jupiter’s Great Red Spot, a behemoth of a tempest that is twice as large as Earth and whose 350 mph winds have been whirling for hundreds of years.

Its contender will be Oval BA, also known as “Red Jr.,” a young six-year storm that is only half Great Red’s size but whose winds are just as fierce.

The two are approaching each other now and are expected to have their closest approach on the Fourth of July, according to Amy Simon-Miller, an astronomer at Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland who has been monitoring the storms.

Don’t worry though, Mike Brown and FEMA will be on the job.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Science at June 6th, 2006 at 10:23 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Christian feeds self to lions

Lioness in zoo kills man who invoked God

A man shouting that God would keep him safe was mauled to death by a lioness in Kiev zoo after he crept into the animal’s enclosure, a zoo official said on Monday.

“The man shouted ‘God will save me, if he exists’, lowered himself by a rope into the enclosure, took his shoes off and went up to the lions,” the official said.

“A lioness went straight for him, knocked him down and severed his carotid artery.”

All in all, it’s more proof Christians have never been persecuted. The Romans probably couldn’t keep them out of the lion pits.

Evolution in action. :)

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Irreverant, Atheism at June 6th, 2006 at 10:15 am by Eric | 0 Comments

I’m planning my next vacation

And thinking of running for Congress to pay for it.

Over 5 1/2 years, Republican and Democratic lawmakers accepted nearly $50 million in trips, often to resorts and exclusive locales, from corporations and groups seeking legislative favors, according to the most comprehensive study to date on the subject of congressional travel.

From January 2000 through June 2005, House and Senate members and their aides were away from Washington for more than 81,000 days — a combined 222 years — on at least 23,000 trips, according to the report, issued yesterday by the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity. About 2,300 of the trips cost $5,000 or more, at least 500 cost $10,000 or more, and 16 cost $25,000 or more.

The problem is I’m not sure if I could suck that much corporate cock. I hear it has a nasty aftertaste.

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in Politics at June 6th, 2006 at 9:36 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Congress has RIAA jizz all over its face

The RIAA wants you to license incidental copies of songs in your browser’s cache and RAM.

This is dangerous language that creates a dangerous precedent. When courts look at how copyright should apply to new digital technologies, they often have few judicial precedents for guidance and thus they turn to the Copyright Act itself for clues about how Congress views similar issues. Incidental copies made in the course of otherwise lawful activities should be treated either as outside the scope of a copyright holder’s rights or as a fair use (even the Copyright Office agrees on the fair use point). But you can be sure that the copyright industries will use SIRA as a precedent to the contrary in future fights.

And that’s not the only dangerous, subtle change that SIRA would effect. By treating digital transmissions as “distributions” under the Copyright Act, SIRA would bolster arguments that the record industry is making in its case against XM Radio. What’s more, the act creates a second, royalty-free compulsory license that applies to incidental copies for noninteractive streaming, subject to an important condition: the music service may not take “affirmative steps to authorize, enable, cause, or induce the making of reproductions of music works by or for end-users.” Like the PERFORM Act, this would erode lawful home recording.

What the hell is wrong with the people? And I mean all of them, Congress and the RIAA alike. How much more anti-technology can you get? And to what end?

IPac has more information and a list of congresscritters to call about the issue.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Posted in Copyright DRM and Media at June 6th, 2006 at 7:52 am by Eric | 0 Comments

On the future of books

Books will disappear. Print is where words go to die

Yet efforts to update the book are hampered because, culturally, we give extreme reverence to the form for the form’s sake. We hold books holy: children are taught there is no better use of time than reading a book. Academics perish if they do not publish. We tolerate censors regulating and snipping television but would never allow them to black out books. We even ignore the undeniable truth that too many books, and far too many bestsellers, are pap or crap. All this might seem to be the medium’s greatest advantage: respect. But that is what is holding books back from the progress that could save and spread the gospel of the written word. Yet efforts to update the book are hampered because, culturally, we give extreme reverence to the form for the form’s sake. We hold books holy: children are taught there is no better use of time than reading a book. Academics perish if they do not publish. We tolerate censors regulating and snipping television but would never allow them to black out books. We even ignore the undeniable truth that too many books, and far too many bestsellers, are pap or crap. All this might seem to be the medium’s greatest advantage: respect. But that is what is holding books back from the progress that could save and spread the gospel of the written word.

Today, any medium that defines itself by its medium is in trouble: newspapers, broadcasting and books must be valued for their substance over their shape. Is a book bound paper? Or is it the ideas and information within? If there are better ways to share knowledge, why should it suffer the limitations of the page?

Books are frozen in time, yet in digital form, they can live in never-ending editions. Short of footnotes and bibliographies, books have little connection to related sources and debates; online, the simple link solves that. You cannot link straight to an idea in a book, nor search for it - though Google could fix that, if only publishers would let them. Hear Ben Vershbow of the Institute for the Future of the Book in the current Library Journal: “Parts of books will reference parts of other books. Books will be woven together out of components in remote databases and servers.” And Kevin Kelly: “In the new world of books, every bit informs another; every page reads all the other pages.”

Geeks such as myself have been heralding the coming age of eBooks for at least a decade now.

On the surface, it seems like a no-brainer. Text, after all, is the simplest data that you can send across the net. You can send an entire copy of War And Peace across the net in seconds even on the slowest of connections, whereas a full length movie still takes several to transmit hours even on the quickest of connections. Digital copies of books should have been a cinch even in the earliest days of the internet.

Yet the eBook revolution never came. There is no iPod for eBooks, you still can’t buy a book digitally, heck, they’re not even pirated much. Many reasons have been offered for why this is (usually it’s something like “The stars haven’t quite aligned yet, but any day now…”), but I think there’s a larger point that’s often missed.

And that point is this: The eBook revolution did come. The problem is that no one noticed it because no one recognized it.

When you look at attempts to do eBooks today, I notice that a lot of effort is put into duplicating the look and feel of a dead tree book. Everything from the font and formatting to having to flip a digital page is preserved. And to be honest, I’ve always scratched my head a bit and wondered why exactly they bother.

I read books online every day. Only they’re not called books, they’re called web pages. You scroll them instead of flip pages. Formatting is adjusted to your screen rather than remaining fixed. They don’t have chapters and page numbers, but rather they have URL’s.

eBooks, digital texts, have been around for a long, long time and will only continue to grow. The author of the article is absolutely right when he says that books are defined by their medium. Page flipping is an artifact of printing on paper, it’s not something that needs to be preserved for digital viewing. The thing about the digital books of the future is that they won’t look at all like the dead tree books of today. People looking for an eBook revolution are hung up on the idea that a book must look like bound paper - they don’t realize that this blog here is as much a book as anything you can find in Barnes & Noble.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Copyright DRM and Media at June 5th, 2006 at 4:01 pm by Eric | 1 Comment
« Previous Entries Next Entries »
Musings of the Great Eric is powered by Wordpress 2.0.2.
Theme by Ensellitis. Show/Hide script by Cross-Browser.com.