Musings of the Great Eric

The interesting, the amazing, and some stuff only I would ever care about


« Toggle Left Sidebar Home Toggle Right Sidebar »

Film rated PG for “Christian Content”, says congressman

Blunt weighs in on movie’s PG rating

Filmmakers regularly gripe that the movie-ratings system is arbitrary and unfair, but it’s uncommon for a lawmaker to entangle himself in the process.

House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) did that, however, just last week that by weighing in on the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) decision to rate a film about a football team at a Christian high school as PG instead of G.

Franklin, Tenn.-based Provident Films declared in a press release last month that its picture, “Facing the Giants,” was “rated PG for explicit Christian content.” Tiny Provident produced the film, which is slated for a September theatrical release and is being distributed by Destination Films and Samuel Goldwyn Films, a unit of Sony Pictures.

It’d be hilarious if it were true. (Personally I’d give movies with a message of religious indoctrination at least an R rating, but that’s me). Unfortunately though, it’s a pure bullshit statement by the congressman:

The MPAA rejects the allegation that the movie’s Christian content is the reason the ratings board decided on PG and says the filmmakers have accepted the board’s ruling.

Clearly, Congressman Blunt is at best confused and at worst a liar. I’m gonna go with the latter, given this statement:

“This incident raises the disquieting possibility that MPAA considers exposure to Christian themes more dangerous for children than exposure to gratuitous sex and mindless violence,” Blunt wrote. “I am sure many of my colleagues share my concern.”

And the story moves from kind of funny and offbeat to deadly scary when you get to here:

Congress has taken an aggressive step this year to increase government oversight of decency in popular entertainment by passing the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act. Blunt sent his letter to the MPAA on the same day that President Bush signed the decency bill, which increases the fines that the Federal Communications Commission can levy on broadcasters.

The guy knew damn well the movie wasn’t rated PG for being too Christian. His statement was a calculated one precisely to rile social conservatives, probably to get out the vote in November. The question is, how far is Congress willing to take it? They’re already exerting tighter control over free speech via the FCC, with the passage of the BDEA last week. The worst case scenario is that they’re laying the groundwork for future legislation involving federal oversight of motion pictures, or that the religious right gets so wound up they start demanding such a thing. Which is frightening as hell, because in the current climate the idea isn’t unimaginable.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Posted in Politics at June 25th, 2006 at 8:37 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

The Merchants of Cool

This is a terrific episode of PBS Frontline from a few years back; it’s one of those documentaries that everyone should watch. The level of marketing today is nothing short of breathtaking; and the depth of deception and manipulation marketers use is nothing short of disgusting.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Posted in Politics at June 25th, 2006 at 5:56 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Nine ways to misunderstand web standards

Google Blogoscoped compiled the list, but I’d just like to briefly rant on number one: “We Need Separate Print Pages”

We’ve all seen this – a separate print page, linked to from a crowded, table-layoutish HTML page, aiming to serve no other need than being printed out (it fails, because bloggers link to print pages – they’re mostly easier to read and not split up into multiple pages). The good thing about these pages is that the user gets an instant impression of what the print-out will look like. Of course, the right way to do this would be to serve a separate stylesheet for medium print, and if the browser does it right, it will show the visitor a print preview.

I can’t tell you how many news sites have cluttered, ad-infested, paginated pages for their articles. Then you click the “print version” and it all goes away… you get the whole article on one clean page, with fewer ads (if any). It’s a thing of beauty. The question I always ask is why the heck isn’t this standard view?

Which I know is a completely separate rant from the one the author was making, but it’s just something that always bugs me.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Technology at June 24th, 2006 at 11:41 am by Eric | 0 Comments

We haven’t just pissed off everyone on Earth

UFO’s aren’t visiting as much, either.

Earth used to be, like, the hottest place for aliens to visit. They would fly billions of light years across the galaxy in their flying saucers just to see how our civilisation was going and if we’d yet figured out whether there was really any difference between cellulite and plain old fat.

These aliens used to love appearing in the background of our holiday snaps, the advanced design of their ships clear for all to see once the image had been digitally enhanced. Sometimes their ships would even make fleeting cameos in home movies, buzzing in and out with astonishing speeds, just like an alien spacecraft equipped with a trans-light hyperdrive, or a fl y passing too close to the camera lens.

They liked us. In fact, they liked us so much that they would sometimes invite people on to their ships, take them for rides around the universe, tell them all about their alien technology and culture, then insert large probes into their bottoms for reasons that are probably none of our business.

These guests were not selected at random and typically had several crucial features in common: they were always from the country; they had very few friends; they were never in possession of any sort of camera; and they never remembered anything until they were either under deep hypnosis or on television, preferably both.

But it has been a very long time since we’ve had a decent UFO sighting. Indeed, it’s been so long that many people have forgotten what UFOs look like. This has had a deleterious effect on UFO sighting statistics, which have fallen with alarming alarmingness over the past few decades.

Clearly, Bush’s foreign policy is to blame. It’s even managed to alienate aliens.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Irreverant at June 24th, 2006 at 11:04 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Ten reasons why HD disc formats already failed

A good list detailing all the ways that the studios have already fucked this up and the technology is doomed from the start. The only thing I’d add is the draconian DRM schemes, especially in the case of Blu-ray. Consumers aren’t going to switch to media that actually does less than the media they have now. Other than that, I think the article does a great job of laying out everything that’s wrong with it.

It’s kind of sad, really - high definition content on a high density disc would be nice, if these guys were capable of designing something with consumers in mind.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Technology, Copyright DRM and Media at June 24th, 2006 at 10:56 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Finally, an ergonomic keyboard for pirates

ARRRRRR!!!!!!

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in Irreverant at June 23rd, 2006 at 6:07 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Is Jon Stewart killing democracy?

From a short blurb in the Washington Post:

Two political scientists found that young people who watch Stewart’s faux news program, “The Daily Show,” develop cynical views about politics and politicians that could lead them to just say no to voting.

The results showed that the participants rated both candidates more negatively after watching Stewart’s program. Participants also expressed less trust in the electoral system and more cynical views of the news media, according to the researchers’ article, in the latest issue of American Politics Research.

I’m just going to go out on a limb here and suggest that rather than blame Jon Stewart for fostering cynism, we should maybe blame the damn politicians that give Stewart so much fodder?

Let’s face it, if people are cynical about politics it’s because there’s a lot to be cynical about, Jon Stewart just points it out to us.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Politics, Pop Culture at June 23rd, 2006 at 4:37 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Good News Everyone!

“Futurama” gets new life on Comedy Central

“Futurama” has a future.

Comedy Central has resurrected the former Fox animated series from “The Simpsons” creator Matt Groening and David X. Cohen. At least 13 new episodes will be produced — the first since the series’ original run from 1999-2003.

The new batch is part of a deal the cable network made with 20th Century Fox Television last year to pick up syndicated rights to the existing “Futurama” library of 72 episodes. Comedy Central also had an option to air any new episodes produced.

New and old episodes will begin airing in 2008 on Comedy Central. Actors Billy West, Katey Sagal and John DiMaggio have agreed to return as voices for “Futurama.”

Screw you Fox - Futurama lives! Hooray!

Network President: “Greetings gentlemen. You already know my execubots. Executive Alpha, programmed to like things it has seen before.”
Executive Alpha: “Hey, hey, hey.”
Network President: “Executive Beta, programmed to roll dice to determine the fall schedule.”
Executive Beta: (rolls dice) “More reality shows!”
Network President: And Executive Gamma, programmed to underestimate middle America.”
Executive Gamma: “It’s funny, but is it going to get them off their tractors?”

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Pop Culture at June 23rd, 2006 at 12:27 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

AT&T: “Principles? Ethics? Nah, better to screw our customers”

AT&T rewrites rules: Your data isn’t yours

AT&T has issued an updated privacy policy that takes effect Friday. The changes are significant because they appear to give the telecom giant more latitude when it comes to sharing customers’ personal data with government officials.

The new policy says that AT&T — not customers — owns customers’ confidential info and can use it “to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.”

The policy also indicates that AT&T will track the viewing habits of customers of its new video service — something that cable and satellite providers are prohibited from doing.

Moreover, AT&T (formerly known as SBC) is requiring customers to agree to its updated privacy policy as a condition for service — a new move that legal experts say will reduce customers’ recourse for any future data sharing with government authorities or others.

It goes into effect today. I’d suggest you close any accounts you may have with them.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Politics at June 23rd, 2006 at 9:49 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Is there any part of our lives they’re NOT spying on?

Bank Data Secretly Reviewed by U.S. to Fight Terror:

Under a secret Bush administration program initiated weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, counterterrorism officials have gained access to financial records from a vast international database and examined banking transactions involving thousands of Americans and others in the United States, according to government and industry officials.

The program is limited, government officials say, to tracing transactions of people suspected of ties to Al Qaeda by reviewing records from the nerve center of the global banking industry, a Belgian cooperative that routes about $6 trillion daily between banks, brokerages, stock exchanges and other institutions. The records mostly involve wire transfers and other methods of moving money overseas or into and out of the United States. Most routine financial transactions confined to this country are not in the database.

Viewed by the Bush administration as a vital tool, the program has played a hidden role in domestic and foreign terrorism investigations since 2001 and helped in the capture of the most wanted Qaeda figure in Southeast Asia, the officials said. The program, run out of the Central Intelligence Agency and overseen by the Treasury Department, “has provided us with a unique and powerful window into the operations of terrorist networks and is, without doubt, a legal and proper use of our authorities,” Stuart Levey, an undersecretary at the Treasury Department, said in an interview Thursday. The program is grounded in part on the president’s emergency economic powers, Mr. Levey said, and multiple safeguards have been imposed to protect against any unwarranted searches of Americans’ records.

The program, however, is a significant departure from typical practice in how the government acquires Americans’ financial records. Treasury officials did not seek individual court-approved warrants or subpoenas to examine specific transactions, instead relying on broad administrative subpoenas for millions of records from the cooperative, known as Swift.

Seriously. They’ve been spying on our phone conversations. They’ve been combing through social networking sites. Now it’s revealed they’re looking at our bank transactions. What else are they looking at? Is there anything they’re not looking at?

The founding fathers would be calling for a revolution right about now.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Politics at June 23rd, 2006 at 9:23 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Congress raises own salaries, but fails to do so for average Americans

Dobbs: Congress stiffs working Americans

Without much fanfare, the House of Representatives last week voted to give members of Congress yet another pay raise, as it has done almost every year for nearly a decade.

For some reason, our elected officials decided against holding a news conference. Maybe that’s because they didn’t want to draw attention to the fact that they raise their own salaries almost every year while refusing to raise the pay of our lowest-paid workers.

I remember something about “Government for the people, by the people, of the people”. I think it must have been a comedian who said it.

By the way, this was written before the vote. The minimum wage increase failed right along party lines. Fucking Republicans.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Politics at June 22nd, 2006 at 10:18 am by Eric | 0 Comments

The 11 Mile Web Page

This is the coolest thing I’ve seen all week: a scale model of a hydrogen atom.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Science at June 22nd, 2006 at 7:49 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Summer camps fear MySpace

Let’s see. Last week it was employers not getting it, so this week it must be summer camps.

Camps say they are increasingly concerned about being identified in photographs or comments on these sites, even innocuously. They worry about online predators tracking children to camp and about their image being tarnished by inappropriate Internet juxtapositions — a mention, say, of the camp on a site that also has crude language or sexually suggestive pictures.

“This is probably the No. 1 issue facing all camp programs,” said Norman E. Friedman, a partner at AMSkier Insurance, a major camp insurer.

Seriously, if MySpace is your biggest issue, you really don’t have much to complain about.

The long and short of it is that the camps are worried about predators (you know, the ones that are aparently over MySpace, and are so much more of a threat than anywhere else. Because there’s never been a camp counselor who was a predator. Yeah). They’re also worried about marketting “What if someone portrays the camp in a bad way? We better stop everyone from talking about our camp!”, and camp counselors with “inappropriate” stuff on their MySpace pages (see the post from last week I linked to, a lot of this is the same issue).

It’s so hard to judge, but I honestly wonder if this isn’t the largest generation gap ever? The story distills down to “Kids are sharing, adults are freaking out about it”. The adults, for lack of a better phrase, simply don’t get it. They’re used to top-down hierarchial control, and they’re baffled by the bottom-up nature of social networking. You can’t exercise total control over where your camp’s name appears. Someone with “inappropriate” material on their MySpace page doesn’t make them a bad person; it just means that kids are sharing this stuff more openly now than they did in generations past.

If I were running any kind of program like this, I’d be thrilled that people networked around the camp community. The fact that you can’t control it is part of what makes it so appealing to these kids in the first place; it’s not the end of the world.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Technology at June 22nd, 2006 at 7:45 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Yet another dumbass quote courtesy Pat Robertson

Yeah, by now who all know that Pat Robertson is batshit crazy. But they keep coming. Here’s his latest:

Pat Robertson claimed that Iran “now has atomic weapons,” even though the U.S. intelligence community, as well as independent experts, agree that Iran is years away from having the capability to manufacture nuclear weapons.

Here’s the full context:

ROBERTSON: It’s shocking what’s happening. And I got home over the weekend and read the 38th chapter of Ezekiel, once again, to see a war that is forecast where a nation identified as Russia and possibly some of the Caucasian states, maybe Turkey, but some of those states in that region, join with Iran, Libya, and the Sudan to move against Israel. A great horde of people to come against Israel, re-gathered from the nations in the latter days.

It’s amazing that Iran has come to the fore as it has with a president who says Israel should be wiped off the map, who — it now has atomic weapons. And a year ago, the Lord told me, as I was praying, that Israel was entering into the most dangerous time in its existence as a nation. He confirmed this again in January, and lo and behold, the events in the — in the current affairs just keep tumbling, tumbling, tumbling upon us. And I look in disbelief.

I don’t know what’s scarier, that the man has a TV show or that people listen to him…

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Politics at June 21st, 2006 at 10:16 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Stonehenge on the Solstice

Courtesy NASA.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Science at June 21st, 2006 at 10:01 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

The purpose of education

A former teacher writes in an essay titled Against School:

Inglis, for whom a lecture in education at Harvard is named, makes it perfectly clear that compulsory schooling on this continent was intended to be just what it had been for Prussia in the 1820s: a fifth column into the burgeoning democratic movement that threatened to give the peasants and the proletarians a voice at the bargaining table. Modern, industrialized, compulsory schooling was to make a sort of surgical incision into the prospective unity of these underclasses. Divide children by subject, by age-grading, by constant rankings on tests, and by many other more subtle means, and it was unlikely that the ignorant mass of mankind, separated in childhood, would ever reintegrate into a dangerous whole.

That, unfortunately, is the purpose of mandatory public education in this country. And lest you take Inglis for an isolated crank with a rather too cynical take on the educational enterprise, you should know that he was hardly alone in championing these ideas. Conant himself, building on the ideas of Horace Mann and others, campaigned tirelessly for an American school system designed along the same lines. Men like George Peabody, who funded the cause of mandatory schooling throughout the South, surely understood that the Prussian system was useful in creating not only a harmless electorate and a servile labor force but also a virtual herd of mindless consumers. In time a great number of industrial titans came to recognize the enormous profits to be had by cultivating and tending just such a herd via public education, among them Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller.

The whole essay is worth a read, but I sort of spoiled it for you with what I quoted.

I don’t know how much I really agree with the conclusion, as I’m not quite sure I’ve become that cynical yet (but hey, I’m only 23, I’ve got a ways to go yet). While I don’t dispute that there’s an awful lot of indoctrination that goes on in schools, I’m not sure it was really planned that way, in a deliberate sort of way. The structure today does churn out good consumerist drones, but I think it was more of a lucky happenstance for the capitalist class rather than a conspiracy among them at the beginning of the century.

Like it our not, free public education is critical to any society which wants to call itself free. However they got this way, the schools need fixing, and quick.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Politics at June 21st, 2006 at 5:28 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

The internet and the news industry

I almost missed this trio of articles that appeared in the Washington Post yesterday, commemorating the tenth anniversary of washingtonpost.com.

The first traces the history of the web site from a 1992 memo through the present day:

It was August 1992. There were no wireless laptops, no BlackBerries, no blogs, no rush to flip on cell phones as soon as your plane hit the runway. Yet, in his hand-written memo, sparked after attending an Apple-organized conference in Hakone, Japan, Kaiser took a peek into a crystal ball of technology and proposed that the company “design the world’s first electronic newspaper.”

“We could organize the entire paper electronically with a series of ‘front pages’ and other devices that would guide readers the way our traditional cues do — headlines, captions, story placement, etc.,” he recommended. “And we could explore the feasibility of incorporating ads in the electronic paper.”

What’s interesting about this anecdote is what it reveals about the thinking back then: that the web would be no different from print. He talked about simply taking the content and putting it on a web page, using all the same formatting and visual cues. There’s little realization that this is a different medium; and certainly no realization of just how profoundly different it would be. It’s companion article, Web Users Open the Gates explains this in more detail:

Big guns such as the Associated Press’s chief executive, Tom Curley, have admitted that the industry seriously fumbled its new media strategy for years by opting to re-purpose material produced to serve print and broadcast audiences.

“When the Web was born as a commercial content enterprise back in the mid-’90s, we thought it was about replicating — that is, ‘repurposing’ — our news and information franchises online,” Curley said. “The news, as ‘lecture,’ is giving way to the news as a ‘conversation’.”

The earlier idea of re-purposing content was not innovative, but it was rational and cost-effective. The Web is flexible. It can “kinda/sorta” replicate an older format, if that’s the goal. It’s useful as a cheap, fast mass delivery system. “Trusted brands,” the thinking went, could establish trusted sites, and transfer their reputations to the new medium.

Newspaper, radio, television … Web! It made sense at the time. But in the 10 years following the birth of washingtonpost.com, the Net and its publishing platform, the World Wide Web, have proved harder to master, scarier to get wrong and more thrilling to get right than expected. Wilder, and discontinuous with the past in a way those coming out of traditional journalism never could have imagined.

That article lists some of the ways it’s changed and how the news industry is being forced to adapt.

The final article is As the Internet Grows Up, the News Industry Is Forever Changed talks about the new economics of journalism, and hones in on the changes on the business side of news.

All in all the articles are a terrific summary of many points I’ve previously tried to make here. The way the news industry works is changing, because the way we get our news is changing. And a different way of getting information about the world means we’re going to end up with altogether different perceptions of that world, which is what makes this stuff worth watching.

This is all from the one paper that I think “gets it” - the Washington Post in the last several years has made great effort to make its content available, accessible, and included in the global conversation. I wish more papers *cough*The NYT*cough* would follow its model rather than desperately clinging to a walled garden model for its pages.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Copyright DRM and Media, Media at June 21st, 2006 at 3:05 pm by Eric | 0 Comments

Do you have 45 Mbps, bi-directional broadband?

If not, you should ask for your money back.

The case is simple: Do you have a 45 Mbps, bi-directional service to your home, paying around $40? Do you have 500+ channels and can choose any competitive service? You paid an estimated $2000 for this product even though you did not receive it and it may never be available. Do you want your money back and the companies held accountable?

In summary, about 10 years ago the Clinton Administration had a plan to upgrade the nation’s networks to fiber optic, from the century old copper lines that still dominate. The telecom industry said “Sure, we’ll do it!… with the right financial incentives”. So the government gave those telecoms billions of dollars to do it, in the form of various tax incentives and subsidies.

It’s 2006. The US ranks 16th in broadband penetration. 30 Mbps connections which are common in places like Sweden and Korea are unheard of here. (For the record, if you have Cable internet, you probably have 3-8 Mbps Downstream/ 128-384 Kbps Upstream asynchronous bandwith into your house).

These are the same telecoms that now claim they need to break net neutrality in order to pay for network upgrades that they said they’d do a decade ago.

There are a lot of corporations and industries I despise for being shit sucking ass magotts. Usually it’s pretty hard to choose among them to decide which is the worst… but lately the telecoms have been taking the cake pretty easily.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Technology, Politics at June 21st, 2006 at 8:19 am by Eric | 0 Comments

FBI shadowed playwright Arthur Miller

Washington Post:

The memo is one of many included in Miller’s FBI files, obtained by The Associated Press through the Freedom of Information Act. Miller, who died last year at age 89, was a longtime liberal who opposed the Vietnam War, supported civil rights and, in one play, “The Crucible,” linked the Cold War pursuit of communists to the Salem witch trials of the 17th century.

His files only became available after his death, but the government’s interest in Miller was well established in his lifetime. In 1956, the House Un-American Activities Committee asked him to give names of alleged communist writers with whom he had attended some meetings in the 1940s. Miller refused and was convicted of contempt of Congress, a decision eventually overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.

For a decade before his congressional testimony, the FBI kept track of the playwright, but ended up making a more convincing case that Miller was a dissenter from the Communist Party rather than a sympathizer.

Miller’s first Broadway play, “The Man Who Had All the Luck,” came out in 1944, around the same time that the earliest FBI files are dated. His professional and personal life were closely watched, usually through newspaper clippings, but also from informants (whose names have been blacked out in the records) and public documents.

The FBI not only kept records of Miller’s political statements, from his opposition to nuclear weapons to his attacks against the anti-communist blacklist, but of his affiliation with such organizations as the American Labor Party (”a communist front”) and the “communist infiltrated” American Civil Liberties Union.

In vain, the FBI probed for communist influence in the content and in the productions of his plays. One memo cites an “informant” who reported that “several communists” have been turned down for roles in various “Arthur Miller playlets.”

Aren’t you glad we’ve learned so much from eras past? There’s no way the government would engage in this sort of stuff anymore, after all.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Politics at June 21st, 2006 at 7:54 am by Eric | 0 Comments

Oh my God, there’s porn on the internet!

Video sites grapple with specter of smut:

Online video-sharing sites such as YouTube, Yahoo Video and Google Video are competing in one of the fastest-growing entertainment segments on the Web. They may also be victims of their own popularity. The vast majority of videos available on these sites depicts budding musicians, comedians, filmmakers or just people vying for attention in innocuous–if sometimes oddball–ways.

But industry insiders say that as the sites collect greater amounts of video, tracking and purging sexually explicit and graphically violent content will become increasingly difficult. Industry insiders say that while prescreening millions of homemade videos is likely to be costly and problematic, failing to police the sites could scare off advertisers and lead to clashes with family advocates and lawmakers.

Materials inappropriate for children are too easy for kids to get their hands on at Google Video, according to the New York State Consumer Protection Board, which issued a warning to parents on June 12. The board has a broad mandate to inform and educate consumers but has no regulatory powers. Nontheless, it will continue to publicize the issue in an effort to force Google Video and other video-sharing sites to do more to protect children, said Jon Sorensen, the board’s spokesman.

I can’t stand that “protect children” bullshit language. It just grates me.

Seriously - I’d like to offer a radical solution here. Let there be porn. It’s easy enough to find on the internet as is. It’s not hurting anyone by being there, and obviously it’s what people want.

“Self-policing flat out doesn’t work,” said Peter Pham, director of business development at Photobucket, a fast-growing photo-sharing site that has recently jumped into video. “The problem is that most of the people finding this material are the people who are looking for this material. And they aren’t going to complain.”

So the people who are looking for it are the ones who are finding it. And they shouldn’t because ______?

Well, because fucking religious nutjobs and social conservatives don’t want you to, and raise the “for the children” nonsense as a way of achieving that. If they don’t want their kids to see it, then don’t let them. Raise your own damn kids instead of putting the onus on me.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Posted in Technology at June 20th, 2006 at 3:40 pm by Eric | 0 Comments
« Previous Entries
Musings of the Great Eric is powered by Wordpress 2.0.2.
Theme by Ensellitis. Show/Hide script by Cross-Browser.com.